The way I understand this, they may or may not ignore the sRGB profile, but the important thing is that they do not use the monitor profile.
I feel that these apps, Photos, Faststone, Edge, simply ignore the sRGB color profile that's attached to the exported JPG? The latest version (20) of ACDSee is also color managed, not free. The free Irfanview image viewer is color managed (must be turned on under Settings).Īdobe Bridge is color managed, and I think it is a free download, even you don't have a Creative Cloud subscription. What you can do is to encourage users to use only color managed apps to view your work - practically all web browsers except Edge and Internet Explorer will display correctly, as long as the profile is embedded. And there is nothing you can do to increase the likelihood of your work displaying correctly on other people's monitors, apart from working with a calibrated display and making sure that images have the sRGB profile embedded.
Since it appears that you have a wide gamut monitor, there is no way you can make your photos appear correct in non-color managed apps like Edge or Photos. That way I trust there's a higher chance my photos are displayed reasonably similar on other people's systems. So I'm still confused with what's happening here, since I'd like to post process in a way in Lightroom and Photoshop, so that the exported JPG (with sRGB) is at least on my machine displayed similar in Edge or the Photos app. I feel that these apps, Photos, Faststone, Edge, simply ignore the sRGB color profile that's attached to the exported JPG? Since when I open the JPG back into Photoshop, it's displayed the same as the RAW file (which renders in ProPhoto) in Lightroom. As I've read in the past, whether you're working with ProPhoto (Lightroom), or AdobeRGB (within Photoshop for instance), when your system is calibrated, it still gets translated to a "universal" rendering of colours, that is within (a certain percentage of) sRGB (if your monitor isn't wide gamut). So that applications don't "use" the display profile one-on-one. It just doesn't make sense to me.Īs far as I remember from a time when I really got into this stuff, I understood that the display profile is sort of the final universal "translation" of colours to the display. I'm still confused that some photo viewers ignore sRGB.
0 kommentar(er)
